I met two of my former high school teachers for lunch today. Neither of them seemed to have changed much, at least not in ways that really matter.
Oh, there may have been a few more hairs gone gray, a wrinkle here or there, but the most precious things about them, the good humor, the nimble minds, the warmth of their good will, pulsed with the same endearing energy.
I continue to marvel at how much of my basic perspective on life was formed by these men and their passion for literature and education and, well, The Human.
When I was a young teen, they instilled in me the notion that being human could be a wonder and that the products of the imagination matter as much or more than bald profit. They taught me that what answers were to be had to the great questions lay in pages crafted by those who went before. They taught me human quandaries were universal. They taught me, if not to love the past, at least to respect it as the source of all possible relief for our deepest sufferings.
Such ideas have served me well, but also left me on the outside in a world that too often holds these notions in scorn.
The conversation focused on teaching. More than once we mentioned students who have no curiosity about the world, no sense that they are responsible for their own education.
I illustrated the point with this story:
One semester while teaching basic public speaking, I had a student whose first four speeches were merely average. They were scattered and sloppy and delivered with a level of energy one normally only sees in long-term prisoners of war.
His fourth speech, declaring his belief that marijuana ought to be legal, stood out. The delivery was still cold and uninvolved, but the rhetoric was polished. The sentence structure was complex, the organization artful. I knew he hadn’t written it.
Later I googled the first sentence. A link took me to a service selling papers for $25 a shot. What a waste of pot money.
The web page showed an abstract of the paper on offer. The first two sentences were almost exact matches with the speech I had heard.
So, he failed.
After the semester ended he contacted me wanting to talk about his grade. I delayed responding to his email as I completed the paperwork necessary to turn him in to the Dean. Not long after, I received a second email saying:
Professor Abbott,
I would very much like to talk to you about my grade if you can spare me the time. If you are available, please let me know. My parents have taken away my car.
Thank you very much.
One of my companions topped this story by relaying that a member of his extended family had served in the athletic department of a major university in the South.
In the course of this man’s duties he spoke to one player’s professor and asked, “Well, what is he doing that’s causing him to fail?”
“He cheats,” the professor said.
“Are you sure,” this man asked.
The professor pulled two quizzes from a shelf.
“This one is from the person he sits next to,” he said.
In answer to one question the student had written, “I don’t know.”
The professor then presented the football player’s paper. Where the first student had written, “I don’t know,” the athlete had written, “I don’t know either.”